経験的グリーン関数法を用いた1997年3月26日 (<i>M<sub>JMA</sub></i>6.5) 及び5月13日 (<i>M<sub>JMA</sub></i>6.3) 鹿児島県北西部地震の強震動シミュレーションと震源モデル

DOI Web Site Web Site 被引用文献36件 参考文献22件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Source Modeling of the Kagoshima-ken Hokuseibu Earthquakes of March 26 (<i>M<sub>JMA</sub></i>6.5) and May 13(<i>M<sub>JMA</sub></i>6.3), 1997, Using Empirical Green's Function Method
  • 経験的グリーン関数法を用いた1997年3月26日(MJMA 6.5)及び5月13日(MJMA 6.3)鹿児島県北西部地震の強震動シミュレーションと震源モデル
  • ケイケンテキ グリーン カンスウホウ オ モチイタ 1997ネン 3ガツ 26ニチ MJMA 6 5 オヨビ 5ガツ 13ニチ MJMA 6 3 カゴシマケン ホクセイブ ジシン ノ キョウシンドウ シミュレーション ト シンゲン モデル
  • Strong ground motion simulation and source modeling of the Kagoshima‐ken Hokuseibu earthquakes of March 26 (MJMA 6.5) and May 13 (MJMA 6.3), 1997, using empirical Green’s function method
  • Strong ground motion simulation and source modeling of the Kagoshima-ken Hokuseibu earthquakes of March 26 (MJMA 6.5) and May 13 (MJMA 6.3), 1997, using empirical Green's function method

この論文をさがす

抄録

In 1997, two magnitude 6 class earthquakes occurred in the northwestern part of Kagoshima prefecture in Japan. One of them occurred on March 26 (MJMA6.5) and the other on May 13 (MJMA6.3). We examined the source models of these two events using the observed seismograms by K-NET at four stations surrounding the source areas. We proposed an objective estimation method to obtain the parameters N and C which are needed for the empirical Green's function method by IRIKURA (1986). This method, we call source spectral ratio fitting method, gives estimates of seismic moment ratio between a large and a small event and their corner frequencies by fitting the observed source spectral ratio with the ratio of source spectra which obeys the ω-2 model. This method has an advantage of removing site effects in evaluating the parameters. The best source model of the March mainshock was estimated by comparing the observed waveforms with synthetics using empirical Green's function method. The size of the asperity is about 7km length in the E-W direction by 6km width in the dip direction. The rupture started at the eastern-bottom of the asperity (8.2km) and extended radially to the western-upper direction. We noticed that the source model with additional small asperity to the eastern extension of major asperity improved the waveform fitting of the east-side station. In case of the May event, the aftershock distribution is ‘L’ shaped, and the mainshock waveforms on the rock site are composed of two clear pulses. The hypocenter of the mainshock is located close to the bottom (7.7km deep) of the intersection of the ‘L’ shape. Therefore, we considered two fault planes, the N-S plane and the E-W plane. The seismic moments of the two pulses were estimated nearly the same. We tested which fault plane ruptured first by comparing the initial part of the observed seismograms with synthetics. The matching was fairly good only when the N-S plane ruptured first and the E-W plane did later. The best source model of the May mainshock consists of two asperities. The first asperity has a size of about 3km length by 4km width in the N-S plane, where the rupture propagated radially from the northern-bottom. The other asperity with almost the same size but trending E-W ruptured radially from the western-bottom about two seconds after the first rupture.

収録刊行物

  • 地震　第２輯

    地震　第２輯 51 (4), 431-442, 1999

    公益社団法人 日本地震学会

被引用文献 (36)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (22)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ