Substrate Specificity of Chitinases from Two Species of Fish, Greenling, Hexagrammos otakii, and Common Mackerel, Scomber japonicus, and the Insect, Tobacco Hornworm, Manduca sexta
Three chitinase isozymes, HoChiA, HoChiB, and HoChiC, were purified from the stomach of the greenling, <I>Hexagrammos otakii</I>, by ammonium sulfate fractionation, followed by column chromatography on Chitopearl Basic BL-03 and CM-Toyopearl 650S. The molecular masses and pIs of HoChiA, HoChiB, and HoChiC are 62 kDa and pH 5.7, 51 kDa and pH 7.6, and 47 kDa and pH 8.8, respectively. Substrate specificities of these chitinases were compared with those of another fish stomach chitinase from the common mackerel, <I>Scomber japonicus</I> (SjChi), as well as two from the tobacco hornworm, <I>Manduca sexta</I> (MsChi535 and MsChi386). The efficiency parameters, <I>k</I><SUB>cat</SUB>⁄<I>K</I><SUB>m</SUB>, toward glycolchitin for HoChiA and SjChi were larger than those for HoChiB and HoChiC. The relative activities of HoChiA and SjChi toward various forms of chitin were as follows: shrimp shell or crab shell α-chitin > β-chitin >> silkworm cuticle α-chitin. On the other hand, the relative activities of HoChiB and HoChiC were β-chitin >> silkworm α-chitin > shrimp and crab α-chitin. MsChi535 preferred silkworm α-chitin to shrimp and crab α-chitins, and no activity was observed toward β-chitin. MsChi386, which lacked the C-terminal linker region and the chitin-binding domain, did not hydrolyze silkworm α-chitin. These results demonstrate that fish and insect chitinases possess unique substrate specificities that are correlated with their physiological roles in the digestion of food or cuticle.
- Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry
Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry 70(4), 971-979, 2006-04-23
Japan Society for Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Agrochemistry