〈想像の共同体〉論批判 : 〈世界単位〉の立場から (<特集>インドネシア 国民の形成 : 故土屋健治教授を偲んで)  [in Japanese] "The Imagined Community" : A Critique from the Viewpoint of "World Uits"(<Special Issue>The Formation of the Indonesian Nation : In Memory of the Late Professor Kenji Tsuchiya)  [in Japanese]

この論文は国立情報学研究所の学術雑誌公開支援事業により電子化されました。The view of the "imagined community" that Benedict Anderson proposed in discussing the formation of the nation-state in Indonesia cannot be considered to be correct in that it overlooks two points. First, this region is not the homogeneous entity that Anderson considers it to be, since it consists of two world units, the Java World and the Maritime Southeast Asia World (Fig. 1). Second, Southeast Asia is a world of pantheism, where the force that attracts people takes the form of an electrode that emits a "point discharge" rather than the "canopy type" seen in Europe (Fig. 2 A, B).

The view of the "imagined community" that Benedict Anderson proposed in discussing the formation of the nation-state in Indonesia cannot be considered to be correct in that it overlooks two points. First, this region is not the homogeneous entity that Anderson considers it to be, since it consists of two world units, the Java World and the Maritime Southeast Asia World (Fig. 1). Second, Southeast Asia is a world of pantheism, where the force that attracts people takes the form of an electrode that emits a "point discharge" rather than the "canopy type" seen in Europe (Fig. 2 A, B).