CLINICAL EVALUATION OF WHOLE BLOOD HISTAMINE RELEASE TEST SIMULTANEOUSLY TESTING MULTIPLE ALLERGENS : Correlated with Bronchial Provocation Test

  • Tabe Kazuaki
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Kaneko Fujito
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Kawamura Noriyuki
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Ootomo Mamoru
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Maeda Yuji
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Hayakawa Tetsuo
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Hasegawa Maki
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Akiyama Kazuo
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Mita Haruhisa
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Shida Takao
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology
  • Miyamoto Terumasa
    National Sagamihara Hospital Clinical Research Center for Rheumato-Allergology

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 全血法による多種抗原同時ヒスタミン遊離試験の臨床的検討 : 吸入誘発試験との相関について

Search this article

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of the novel histamine release test (HRT), which allows the determination of many allergens at the same time using a small amount of whole blood, with other conventional allergen diagnostic tests. HRT and RAST were both performed along with bronchial provocation tests (BPT) on 44 bronchial asthma patients in whom the etiologic allergen could not be determined by either intracutaneous tests (ICT) or ophthalmic response tests (ORT). The HRT uses a microtiterplate on which glass fibers have 10 kinds of allergens affixed. The histamine release ability at 6 different concentrations of each kind of allergen was examined. The concordance of HRT with respect to BPT was the highest at 82% in comparison with RAST at 66%, ICT at 55% and ORT at 60%. With each of the allergens, HRT had the highest concordance with BPT. On the other hand, RAST, ICT and ORT showed different results depending on the allergens. The positive predictive value of HRT was the highest at 76% compared with RAST at 59%, ICT at 51% and ORT at 64%. From these results, we concluded that HRT is a more useful diagnostic method for the confirmation of a clinical allergy than other conventional diagnostic methods.

Journal

Citations (6)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top