「合意する主体」による正義の幻想 : 契約論的平等から反証的正義へ

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Myth of Justice as Consensus

この論文をさがす

抄録

What determines the content of justice? The consensus among subjects, justified by social contact, is one answer to this question. Current liberalism maintains that consensus is constructed by social contract - but does the principle of consensus among subjects really lead to the theory of justice? It is important to notice that the current theory of consensus implies that those who cannot satisfactorily participate in consensus are no longer subjects. This article insists that justice should not be based on consensus, but understood as a process of falsification, implying that justice should also remain provi sional.

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ