Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Nicorandil in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris in China

    • Zhu Wen-Ling
    • Division of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    • Zhu Yuan-Dong
    • Research Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    • Guo Jing-Xuan
    • Division of Cardiology, The Third Hospital of the Peking University
    • Wei Jia-Ping
    • Division of Cardiology, The Xuan Wu Hospital of The Capital University

    • Yang Xin-Chun
    • Division of Cardiology, The Beijing Chao Yan Hospital of The Capital University
    • Li Tian-De
    • Division of Cardiology, The PLA General Hospital
    • Jia San-Qing
    • Division of Cardiology, The Beijing Friendship Hospital of the Capital University of Medical Sciences
    • He Qing
    • Division of Cardiology, The Beijing Hospital

    • Chen Jun-Zhu
    • Division of Cardiology, The No.1 Hospital of the Zhen Jiang University
    • Wu Zong-Gui
    • Division of Cardiology, The Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
    • Li Zhan-Quan
    • Division of Cardiology, The Ren Min Hospital of Liao Ning Province
    • You Kai
    • Division of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Abstract

Background The efficacy and safety of nicorandil were evaluated in Chinese patients with stable angina pectoris (AP) in a double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Methods and Results After a 2-week washout period, 232 patients with stable AP were randomized to receive either nicorandil (5 mg tid; 115 patients) or isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN: 20 mg bid; 117 patients) for 2 weeks. Exercise capacity, number of weekly anginal attacks, nitroglycerin (NTG) consumption, and safety were evaluated. Nicorandil and ISMN significantly prolonged the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression in an exercise tolerance test. Both drugs improved the total exercise time and the time to onset of chest pain. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Nicorandil significantly decreased the number of anginal attacks and NTG consumption. ISMN decreased the number of anginal attacks significantly; however, there was no significance in NTG consumption, and the ratio of anginal attack reduction was at least 50% was significantly higher with nicorandil. Nicorandil was well tolerated and there was no safety profile difference compared with ISMN. Thus, nicorandil may have equivalent or better antianginal effect than ISMN. Conclusions Nicorandil is beneficial as treatment for AP.

Journal

Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society   [List of Volumes]

Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society 71(6), 826-833, 2007-05-20  [Table of Contents]

Japanese Circulation Society

References:  30

You must have a user ID to see the references.If you already have a user ID, please click "Login" to access the info.New users can click "Sign Up" to register for an user ID.

Cited by:  1

You must have a user ID to see the cited references.If you already have a user ID, please click "Login" to access the info.New users can click "Sign Up" to register for an user ID.

Preview

Preview

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID) :
    110006273820
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID) :
    AA11591968
  • Text Lang :
    ENG
  • Article Type :
    Journal Article
  • ISSN :
    13469843
  • Databases :
    CJP  CJPref  NII-ELS  J-STAGE