技術のオントロギー : イヌイトの技術複合システムを通してみる自然=文化人類学の可能性 (特集 技術を語る民族誌の新たな地平) The Ontology of Technology : Considering the Potentiality of Natural-Cultural Anthropology through an Analysis of the Inuit Technological-Complex System

この論文をさがす

著者

抄録

本稿の目的は、カナダ極北圏の先住民、イヌイトの人びとの間にみられる一連の諸技術を一つの事例に、「自然=人間(社会・文化)」の一元論的視点から人類の技術の営みを世界生成の機械として捉える自然=文化人類学の技術複合システム論を提示し、その可能性を探ることである。そのために、本稿ではまず、イヌイトの生業システムについて検討し、その生業システムによって、「自然」も「人間」もない一元的な世界から、イヌイトやさまざまな野生生物など、さまざまなカテゴリーが絶え間なく産出され、一つの秩序化された生活世界が持続的に生成されてゆくメカニズムを明らかにする。そのうえで、この生業システムがイヌイトのさまざまな技術の営みを組織化する統辞法になっていること、すなわち、この生業システムによって、野生生物を含めた生態環境とのかかわり合いをめぐる技術と知識から、社会関係をめぐる社交の技術にいたるまで、イヌイト社会にみられる一連の諸技術が、一貫した技術複合システムとして安定的かつ柔軟に組織化されている様子を追跡する。そして最後に、このイヌイトの技術複合システムの考察を通して、「自然=人間(社会・文化)」の一元的な存在論から出発し、人類の技術の営みを世界生成のための機械として捉える自然=文化人類学の視座を提示し、その自然=文化人類学の視座が人類の技術の研究に対して拓く可能性について考える。

This paper analyzes an assemblage of technologies practiced by the indigenous Inuit societies in the Canadian Arctic. By proposing a series of technological practices of human beings as world poiesis machines, I examine the potential of the natural-cultural anthropological approach to human technology based on the monistic worldview of nature-human.' For that purpose, I elucidate the mechanism of the Inuit subsistence system in chapter II. In that system, a continual distinction is drawn between Inuit' and 'wildlife.' That world does not have a pre-existing 'nature' vs. 'human' dichotomy, and maintains itself by ceaselessly bringing forth such categories into an ordered and systematized life-world called 'nuna' (land). The practice of subsistence is not only the economic activity that distributes the resources necessary for sustaining life, but also the social practice that ecologically connects the Inuit people with wild animals. Social relationships among the Inuit are provided through such practices. Moreover, the practice of subsistence is also a practice of cultural and ethical activities that actualize the world view that the Inuit strive to achieve. In that sense, the subsistence system of the Inuit lies at the core of their politics, economy, society, and culture, and binds those activities together. In other words, it establishes the order of the life-world with a single breath. As the Inuit often emphasize, it is their way of life that forms the foundation of their lives. In chapter III, I investigate the way in which that subsistence system flexibly incorporates a series of technologies practiced by the Inuit in their society to stabilize their life-world. I focus on the subsistence technologies and ecological knowledge that provide the very foundation of their engagement with wildlife, as well as the societal knowledge and technologies necessary for their social interactions. The establishment of a series of technologies-such as the 'tactical' techniques to entice wild animals in subsistence activities, the ecological knowledge necessary for these activities, and the art of social intercourse to maintain trust and cooperation among the Inuit-is the logical consequence of the subsistence system that ceaselessly establishes and maintains the order of the Inuit life-world. Therefore, such technologies should be understood as coherently-integrated parts of a complex system of technologies according to the principle of a subsistence system. In that system, the circulation of the social relationships among the Inuit and the ecological relationships with various species of wild animals are closed. Nonetheless, the system lets the Inuit acquire all their resources, including food, as well as the means to adjust within their social relationships, including politics and economy; thus, it provides for their entire lives. The Inuit people are connected to the globalized world network, but can also maintain the autonomy of that subsistence as a way of life so long as they continue practicing their subsistence activities within that closed system. Provided that the social relationships among the Inuit and the ecological relationships between humans and wild animals are cyclically generated, the system can maintain itself even if it accommodates things from the outside. As previous anthropological research in the Arctic has indicated, Inuit society can be (and will be) sustained based on the continuing practice of subsistence, even with the introduction of high-tech gadgets into their subsistence techniques, and with the new habit of eating processed food such as hamburgers. In that sense, the technological complex system of the Inuit society can be understood as a world poiesis machine that flexibly creates, stabilizes, and maintains 'nuna' according to the principle of the subsistence system. In chapter IV, I propose a natural-cultural anthropological approach to human technology based on the monistic worldview of 'nature-human' that recognizes the technological practices of human beings as world poiesis machines. In that approach, technological practices of all kinds are integrated into and understood as world poiesis machines, organizing humans and non-humans into a life-world; it is driven by the worldview envisioned by the practitioners (which is a vision of what the world should be). As Latour [2008] indicates, the technological practices based on technoscience are inevitably integrated into the modern world poiesis machine that organizes humans and non-humans into a global technoscience network based on and driven by the modern 'nature/human' dualistic worldview. So the series of Inuit technologies, such as subsistence technologies and the art of social intercourse, are integrated into the 'nuna' poiesis machine, which organizes the Inuit and wildlife into 'nuna.' Such practices are propelled by their worldview, in which the reciprocal relationship between the Inuit and wildlife is indicated as the ideal that they should achieve. Besides the life-world poiesis machines investigated in this paper, what kinds of machines have human beings created since the beginning of the history? And what kinds of machines are they able to create in the future? In my conclusion, I propose that the task of natural-cultural anthropology is to discover and develop the potential of human beings by showing the diversity of the life-world poiesis machines that they have created, and to elucidate those mechanisms ontologically.

収録刊行物

  • 文化人類学

    文化人類学 77(1), 105-127, 2012

    日本文化人類学会

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    110009479495
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AA11958949
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • ISSN
    1349-0648
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    023883446
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z8-240
  • データ提供元
    NDL  NII-ELS 
ページトップへ