判決理由と判断効－独立当事者参加の一部の者の上訴を例として－

DOI 機関リポジトリ Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ハンケツ リユウ ト ハンダンコウ ドクリツ トウジシャ サンカ ノ イチブ ノ モノ ノ ジョウソ オ レイ ト シテ
  • ハンケツ リユウ ト ハンダンコウ ドクリツ トウジシャ サンカ ノ イチブ ノ モノ ノ ジョウソ ヲ レイ ト シテ

この論文をさがす

抄録

type:text

In Japan, the reasons of the judgement has no effect. It is the same system in Germany. In U.S.A. by the Issue Preclusion, it is another way. And it is the problem about the range of the effect of the judgement and also what is the subject of the suit in Japan. For that I think the reasons of the judgement has the effect in Japan. Because the judge did the decision and the parties insist in the suit and those are admitted and written in the reasons of the judgement by the judge. It is also effective for the third persons who have the interest in the suit and they can have the suit later about new facts and his own matters. The effect of the judgement has the effect for the third parties who have the interest with the judgement. And they can have the suit later under the effect of the former judgement about their own insist and new facts. This idea is for the estoppel and the truth. And by this system, the case is cleared at once and for the third person thoroughly. I hope the reform of the civil procedure law in Japan.

論文

source:Josai contemporary policies researches

identifier:JOS-18819001-0301

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ