国際司法裁判所判決の履行に関する一考察 : 最近の判例を中心に

DOI HANDLE Web Site Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Compliance with Judgments of the International Court of Justice in Light of Recent Cases
  • コクサイ シホウ サイバンショ ハンケツ ノ リコウ ニ カンスル イチ コウサツ : サイキン ノ ハンレイ オ チュウシン ニ
  • 国際司法裁判所と国際刑事裁判所 : 手続的観点からみた協働と補完
  • コクサイ シホウ サイバンショ ト コクサイ ケイジ サイバンショ : テツズキテキ カンテン カラ ミタ キョウドウ ト ホカン

この論文をさがす

抄録

The Statute of the International Court of Justice（ICJ）does not include any provision when a State Party fails to comply with its judgments. Instead, under Article 94, Paragraph 2 of the United Nations Charter, a State Party may take recourse to the Security Council and the Council may take any action on the enforcement of judgments of the Court. However, this system has rarely been invoked so far and the Council has never employed its Article 94, Paragraph 2 powers. Nevertheless, it is said that the States Parties have generally complied with the judgments of the Court. That is because they assume the obligation to comply with its decisions when States agree to submit their dispute to the Court. Can this really be so? In practice, it is not easy to decide whether compliance has really taken place or not. Actually, in recent years, some States tend to bring cases before the Court regarding previous judgment of the Court. Focusing on some recent practice, this paper analyzes the current situation and some problems of the Court regarding compliance with its judgments. As the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, the Court may continue to play an active and flexible role for overall peaceful settlement of interstate disputes. Flexible commitment of the Council is also expected for prompt compliance with the judgments of the Court.

収録刊行物

  • 一橋法学

    一橋法学 17 (3), 63-78, 2018-11-10

    一橋大学大学院法学研究科

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ