The Rectification of Width and Area of the Ciliary Cleft in Dogs

    • KAWATA Manabu
    • Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Course of Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University
    • TSUKIZAWA Hisae
    • Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Course of Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University
    • NAKAYAMA Masanari
    • Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Course of Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University
    • HASEGAWA Takashi
    • Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Course of Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University

Read/Search this Article

Abstract

The width and area of the ciliary cleft (CCW and CCA) measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy was rectified to compare dogs of different body sizes/weights: toy breeds group (TBG), small BG (SBG), medium BG (MBG), and large/giant BG (LGBG). A linear correlation was detected between the natural log of body weight and the ocular axial length (OAL) reflecting the ocular size (OS) (r=0.81, P<0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between OAL and the distance of the Schwalbe line—the anterior lenticular capsule (SLD) (r=0.87, P<0.001), suggesting that SLD could rectify canine OS. Rectified CCW (r-CCW) and rectified CCA (r-CCA) were calculated using SLD and fixed SLD as the SLD mean (SLDM). The SLDM was 2.55 mm in this study, and the r-CCW and the r-CCA were calculated as r-CCW = CCW × (2.55/SLD) and r-CCA = CCA × (2.55/SLD)2. The CCW values of TBG, SBG, and MBG were narrower than those of LGBG (P<0.05). There were significant statistical differences in the CCA between any groups other than TBG and SBG (P<0.05). While, there were no significant differences in the r-CCW and r-CCA in all groups. In addition, CCW/SLD did not show significant changes in dogs with different body sizes/weights. These results suggested that the r-CCW, r-CCA, and CCW/SLD were available for comparison between dogs of different body sizes/weights.

Journal

Journal of Veterinary Medical Science  

Journal of Veterinary Medical Science advpub(0), 0912040087, 2010 

Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID) :
    130000149946
  • Text Lang :
    en
  • ISSN :
    0916-7250
  • Databases :
    J-STAGE 

Export