Menière論文と19世紀の反応

DOI Web Site 参考文献8件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Reactions after Menière’s Report in the 19th Century
  • メディカル・エッセイ Meniere論文と19世紀の反応(第1編)発表直後の反応
  • メディカル ・ エッセイ Meniere ロンブン ト 19セイキ ノ ハンノウ(ダイ1ヘン)ハッピョウ チョクゴ ノ ハンノウ
  • Reactions after Meni^|^egrave;re^|^rsquo;s Report in the 19th Century
  • —Part 1. Immediate Responses after the Preliminary Oral Presentation—
  • ―第一編：発表直後の反応―

この論文をさがす

抄録

Rather early articles published soon after Menière’s oral presentation on February 12, 1961 were summarised and discussed. Signol & Vulpian’s article supported both Flourens’ and Menière’s articles based upon a cock which suffered from a head injury after fighting with another. The neural phenomena were confirmed by the autopsy.<br> Brown-Sequard’s article is against Menière based upon the animal experiments and autopsies. He insisted that injury to the acoustic nerve gave rise to spasm, vertigo, and other cerebral syptoms. Hillairet’s article is agaist Menière based upon a case of chronic otitis accompanied with necrosis of the pyramid with a large polyp. Although he suggests the action reflex upon the cerebellum and peduncles, the article depends on quotatins with hypotheses, and the evidense is lacking. As a supplement, the two manuscripts by Menière for the application of the position formerly owned by the late Itard are introduced with Menière’s signature.<br>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (8)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ