Discrepancy between Preoperative Imaging and Postoperative Pathological Finding of Ruptured Intracranial Dissecting Aneurysm, and Its Surgical Treatment: Case Report

  • OTA Nakao
    Stroke Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Teishinkai Hospital
  • TANIKAWA Rokuya
    Stroke Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Teishinkai Hospital
  • KAMIYAMA Hiroyasu
    Stroke Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Teishinkai Hospital
  • MIYAZAKI Takanori
    Department of Neurosurgery, Abashiri Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Hospital
  • NODA Kosumo
    Stroke Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Teishinkai Hospital
  • KATSUNO Makoto
    Department of Neurosurgery, Abashiri Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Hospital
  • IZUMI Naoto
    Department of Neurosurgery, Abashiri Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Hospital
  • HASHIMOTO Masaaki
    Department of Neurosurgery, Abashiri Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Hospital

この論文をさがす

抄録

The choice of therapeutic strategy for intracranial dissecting aneurysm is often based on radiographic features, including characteristic geometry (e.g., irregular stenosis, segmental stenosis, aneurysm formation [pearl-and-string sign]), irregular fusiform or aneurysmal dilation, double lumen, and tapering occlusion. However, there is often a discrepancy between preoperative radiographic data and actual dissecting length. The present report describes three cases in which there was a discrepancy between preoperative radiographic data and actual dissecting length in patients undergoing direct trapping with or without revascularization. All three cases experienced good outcomes, but these cases underscore the fact that open surgery is a good option for management of ruptured intracranial dissecting aneurysms for determination of the rupture point, dissecting length, and the relationship between dissecting area and small arteries arising from the associated vessel.

収録刊行物

参考文献 (29)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ