Menière論文と19世紀の反応

DOI Web Site 参考文献3件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Reactions after Menière’s Report in the 19th Century
  • メディカル・エッセイ Meniere論文と19世紀の反応(第5編)病名の起源と混乱
  • メディカル ・ エッセイ Meniere ロンブン ト 19セイキ ノ ハンノウ(ダイ5ヘン)ビョウメイ ノ キゲン ト コンラン
  • Reactions after Meni^|^egrave;re^|^rsquo;s Report in the 19th Century
  • —Part 5. Terminology and Confusion—
  • ―第五編：病名の起源と混乱―

この論文をさがす

抄録

Following Menière’s report of a peculiar type of deafness accompanied with manifold symptoms such as tinnitus, vertigo, nausea and unstable gait, countless nomenclatures evolved from both the otologists and neurologists. These included as follows; “Peculiar type of the lesion in the inner ear”, “Aural lesion of Menière’s type”, “Apoplectic type of hearing loss” and “vertigo ab aure loesa”, just to mention a few. It was Simon Duplay who recognized the aural lesion of Menière as a nosological entity and termed it “Menière’s disease” in 1872, but his definition was acute labyrinthitis which corresponds to Menière’s disease without the firm evidence of labyrinthitis. Thereafter the terms, “Vertigo of Menière”, “Menière’s symptoms”, “Symtom complex of Menière”, “Idiopathic type of Menière’s disease”, “Secondary type of Menière’s disease”, and “Menière’s syndrome” followed with supplementary comments. At the end of the 19th century, Menière’s disease tended to be divided into two groups; Menière’s disease in the narrow sense and Menière’s syndrome in the wider and broader sense.<br>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ