書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Spatial-Orientational Behavior for the Narrative in a Field
- フィールドにおける語り分析のための身体の空間陣形 : 科学コミュニケーターの展示物解説行動における立ち位置の分析
- フィールド ニ オケル カタリ ブンセキ ノ タメ ノ シンタイ ノ クウカン ジンケイ : カガク コミュニケーター ノ テンジブツ カイセツ コウドウ ニ オケル タチ イチ ノ ブンセキ
- 科学コミュニケーターの展示物解説行動における立ち位置の分析
- A Case Study on Science Communicators’Standing Position Employed to Display the Readi ness to Start Giving an Explanation of the Exhibit
この論文をさがす
抄録
This study addresses how environments for specialists reciting a narrative are estab-<br>lished when they (e.g., science communicators) need to give an explanation to non-<br> specialists (e.g., visitors). To analyze the videotaped data, we employed the notion<br> of spatial-orientation behavior (proposed by Adam Kendon). Spatial orientation com-<br>prises two formation types: F-formation and H-formation. The F-formation is when<br> the participants stand in an O-space, and everyone has an equal right to speak. The<br> H-formation includes head position as a factor of the study; where, a single participant<br> faces the rest of the participants that are typically lined-up in a row. The single par-<br>ticipant has more rights to speak than the rest. This study focuses on the H-formation<br> with the hypothesis that it is one way to signal readiness to start a narrative, i.e.,<br>establishes the environment to recite a narrative. Two case studies are provided in<br> this study. Case Study I gives an example of the H-formation, wherein the specialist<br> exerts a privileged right to talk to the novices. Case Study II illustrates an example<br> of the F-formation, with the specialist ending up with starting the narrative to the<br> novices, which acts as an excuse, as the specialist does not have the privileged right to<br> talk to the novices. For one thing, the reciting of the narrative in this example only<br> started as a response to a question from one of the novices. Additionally, the narrative<br> including with the contraction structures by gestures giving novice the chance to notice<br> the answer for his/her question. The results demonstrate how the type of formation<br> relates to the construction and presentation of the specialist’s narrative. The results of<br> the two analyses demonstrate that the formation consisted of the two types, and that<br> participants use H-formation as a resource for establishing the environment for reciting<br> the narrative.
収録刊行物
-
- 認知科学
-
認知科学 22 (1), 53-68, 2015
日本認知科学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001204484245504
-
- NII論文ID
- 130005099419
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN1047304X
-
- ISSN
- 18815995
- 13417924
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 026255142
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可