Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study
-
- Aktürk Semra
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Inönü Univesity: Malatya, Turkey
-
- Kaya Arzu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
-
- Çetintaş Derya
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elazığ Education and Research Hospital, Turkey
-
- Akgöl Gürkan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
-
- Gülkesen Arif
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
-
- Kal Gül Ayden
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elazığ Education and Research Hospital, Turkey
-
- Güçer Tülin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Anadolu Hospital, Turkey
この論文をさがす
抄録
<p>[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- J Phys Ther Sci
-
J Phys Ther Sci 30 (3), 448-453, 2018
理学療法科学学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282679306723328
-
- NII論文ID
- 130006413832
-
- ISSN
- 21875626
- 09155287
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可