Contiguity Between Ablation Lesions and Strict Catheter Stability Settings Assessed by VISITAG Module Improve Clinical Outcomes of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation : Results From the VISITALY Study

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Contiguity Between Ablation Lesions and Strict Catheter Stability Settings Assessed by VISITAG<sup>TM</sup> Module Improve Clinical Outcomes of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ― Results From the VISITALY Study ―

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Background:Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with contact force technology, using an automated lesion tagging system (VISITAGTM module) with strict criteria of catheter stability.</p><p>Methods and Results:We enrolled 200 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 11 centers and were followed up for 12 months. The stability setting was within 3 mm for ≥10 s and for ≥15 s in 47% and 53% of patients, respectively. A mean of 67.2±21.9 VISITAGs was acquired. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias at follow-up was 77.5% (155/200), and the contiguity between lesions was associated with a higher chronic success rate (96% vs. 77.1%; log-rank P=0.036). Radiofrequency (RF), fluoroscopy times, and recurrence rates at the 12-month follow-up were significantly lower than in a comparison group of 80 patients without VISITAGTM module (42.7±14.5 vs. 50.9±23.6 min; P=0.032; 11.6±7.8 vs. 18.4±12.8 min; P=0.003 and 22.5% vs. 41.2%; P=0.02). Two major complications (1 cardiac tamponade and 1 minor stroke) were observed only in the control group.</p><p>Conclusions:Paroxysmal AF ablation with contact force technology and strict criteria of stability using the VISITAG module was a safe procedure, associated with an improvement in efficiency and a reduction of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at the 12-month follow-up compared with manual annotation. Contiguity between lesions seemed to enhance effectiveness outcomes.</p>

収録刊行物

  • Circulation Journal

    Circulation Journal 82 (4), 974-982, 2018

    一般社団法人 日本循環器学会

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (22)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ