Re-evaluation of Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor on Pregnancy Course in Patients with Threatened Preterm Delivery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Komatsu Hiroaki
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital, Yamaguchi 753-0092, Japan
  • Taniguchi Fuminori
    Division of Reproductive-Perinatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
  • Harada Takashi
    Division of Reproductive-Perinatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
  • Nakaso Takaya
    Division of Reproductive-Perinatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
  • Nishimura Noriko
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital, Yamaguchi 753-0092, Japan
  • Tsukihara Satoru
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital, Yamaguchi 753-0092, Japan
  • Sarugami Masako
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital, Yamaguchi 753-0092, Japan
  • Harada Tasuku
    Division of Reproductive-Perinatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
  • Kanamori Yasunobu
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital, Yamaguchi 753-0092, Japan

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Background We evaluated the necessity of urinary trypsin inhibitor for patients with threatened premature labor.</p><p>Methods We enrolled 146 women with singleton pregnancies who were treated for threatened premature labor as inpatients. The uterine cervical length of each patient was ≤ 25 mm at 22–35 weeks of gestation on transvaginal ultrasonography. The patients were divided into two groups: the urinary trypsin inhibitor group (91 patients treated with urinary trypsin inhibitor daily) or non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group (55 patients not treated with urinary trypsin inhibitor). The childbirth outcomes were retrospectively assessed.</p><p>Results The median cervical length measured on the day of admission was almost similar between the urinary trypsin inhibitor and non-urinary trypsin inhibitor groups. Depending on the symptoms of uterine contractions, we determined whether ritodrine hydrochloride and/or magnesium sulfate would be appropriate for treatment. The median gestational week at birth was 38 weeks in the urinary trypsin inhibitor group, and no obvious differences were observed when compared with the non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group. With regard to birth weight, no significant difference was found between the two groups (urinary trypsin inhibitor group, 2776 g; non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group, 2800 g).</p><p>Conclusion Our data showed no significant beneficial effects of urinary trypsin inhibitor in the maternal course and delivery outcomes.</p>

収録刊行物

  • Yonago Acta Medica

    Yonago Acta Medica 62 (2), 204-210, 2019

    ヨナゴ・アクタ・メディカ刊行会

参考文献 (21)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ