書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Acquiring Cell Site Location Information Requires Warrant
- 基地局位置情報取得捜査と令状の要否 : Carpenter v. United States判決を契機として[米国連邦最高裁2018.6.22]
- キチキョク イチ ジョウホウ シュトク ソウサ ト レイジョウ ノ ヨウヒ : Carpenter v. United States ハンケツ オ ケイキ ト シテ[ベイコク レンポウ サイコウサイ 2018.6.22]
- in reference to Carpenter v. United States
- Carpenter v. United States 判決を契機として
この論文をさがす
抄録
In June 22, 2018, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision, which held in a 5-4 decision that The Government’s acquisition of Carpenter’s cell-site records was a Fourth Amendment search. Prior to Carpenter, the Supreme Court held that a person had no legitimate expectation of privacy in regards to dialed telephone numbers conveyed to telephone company voluntarily turned over to third parties, and therefore a search warrant was not required to obtain the information. This legal theory is known as the third-party doctrine, established by the Supreme Court case Smith v. Maryland (1979). In this paper, we discuss the third-party doctrine and analyze each justice’s opinion about the Supreme Court Decision of Carpenter case.
収録刊行物
-
- 情報法制研究
-
情報法制研究 4 (0), 15-27, 2018
情報法制学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282752341190400
-
- NII論文ID
- 130007723553
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA12783895
-
- ISSN
- 24329649
- 24330264
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 029371730
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可