Positive End-expiratory Pressure Improves Respiratory Function in Obese but not in Normal Subjects during Anesthesia and Paralysis

  • Paolo Pelosi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Irene Ravagnan
    Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy.
  • Gabriella Giurati
    Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy.
  • Mauro Panigada
    Resident, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Nicola Bottino
    Resident, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Stefano Tredici
    Resident, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Giuditta Eccher
    Resident, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Luciano Gattinoni
    Chief Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

抄録

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index &lt; 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index &gt; 40 kg/m2).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P &lt; 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P &lt; 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P &lt; 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P &lt; 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/-7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P &lt; 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P &lt; 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P &lt; 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/-30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P &lt; 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P &lt; 0.01).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>During anesthesia and paralysis, PEEP improves respiratory function in morbidly obese patients but not in normal subjects.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • Anesthesiology

    Anesthesiology 91 (5), 1221-1221, 1999-11-01

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ