Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation

  • Mark E. Steiner
    Harvard Community Health Plan, Harvard Medical School, Tufts Medical School, Boston, Sports Medicine Brookline, Brookline, Massachusetts
  • Aaron T. Hecker
    Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Charles H. Brown
    Harvard Community Health Plan, Harvard Medical School
  • Wilson C. Hayes
    Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Comparison of Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Grafts

抄録

<jats:p> This study assessed the tensile properties of hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament recon structions in older cadaveric knees (age range, 48 to 79 years). Mechanical testing to failure was conducted by translating the tibia anteriorly at 1 mm/sec with the knee in 20° of flexion. The strongest gracilis-semitendinosus graft fixation technique (103% of intact anterior cruciate ligament) had the tendons doubled and secured with soft tissue washers (P < 0.01 ). However, all reconstruc tions using gracilis-semitendinosus grafts were signifi cantly less stiff than the intact anterior cruciate ligament specimens regardless of fixation technique (P< 0.01 ). The highest strength patellar tendon graft fixation tech nique (84% of intact anterior cruciate ligament) was ob tained with a combination interference screw and suture technique. The difference in stiffness between a patellar tendon graft and an intact anterior cruciate ligament was not significant when interference screws were placed at both ends of the graft (P > 0.05). Both types of grafts failed most often on the tibial side. With appropriate fixa tion, both grafts approximated the intact anterior cruci ate ligament in strength, but only patellar tendon grafts secured with interference screws were comparable in stiffness. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (16)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ