法主体の再検討

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Reconsiderations of Legal Agents
  • ホウ シュタイ ノ サイケントウ ベンゴシ カツドウ フンソウ トウジシャ オヨビ ホウ キハン ノ アリ ヨウ ト ノ カンレン デ
  • With Reference to Public Lawyering, Rational Discourse of Disputants, and Reflexive Legal Regulations
  • 弁護士活動、紛争当事者及び法規範のありようとの関連で

この論文をさがす

抄録

The autonomous nature of legal agents has been emphasized from the libertarian perspective in recent years. However, such arguments should be critically reconsidered.<br>First, the vulnerable parties, such as homeless people, have been increasing due to the de-regulation policy since the 1990s. Public lawyering is indispensable to achieve equal protection of legal agents in such contexts. Second, rational discourse among legal agents, i.e. disputants, is more often than not difficult to attain, even though it is presupposed for the rule of law. For example, child-custody disputes, and the conflicts among condominium owners are such emotional, non-rational cases.<br>Third, civil law norms conflict with one another. Therefore they cannot be explained away by the pro-liberal, autonomous principles.<br>Fourth, on the other hand, we are facing the renaissance of legal agents in a different sense in the post-modern risk society. The central legal control has now been considered illusory, because the scientific prediction of long-term causal consequences, especially in the environmental issues, has become critically doubted.<br>The reflexive, centrifugal legal regulations based on multi-polar legal agents, including various organizations, i.e. legal subsystems, have necessarily emerged in a post-modern, pragmatic sense.

収録刊行物

  • 法社会学

    法社会学 2006 (64), 177-187,280, 2006

    日本法社会学会

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ