Archaeology after structuralism : post-structuralism and the practice of archaeology
著者
書誌事項
Archaeology after structuralism : post-structuralism and the practice of archaeology
Routledge, 1990
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全15件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographies and index
収録内容
- The joker is wild, the text untameable / Gareth Burr
- Undermining archaeology / Willy Maley
- Discourse and domination / Shaun Waterman
- The experience and identity of "woman" / Ruth Bagnal
- On modernity and archaeological discourse / Christopher Tilley
- Archaeology through the looking-glass / Tim Yates
- Writing, authority, and the determination of a subject / Paul Moran and David Shaun Hides
- This perfect body, this virgin text / Jarl Nordbladh and Tim Yates
- Nietzsche, Derrida, and Foucault / Ian Bapty
- The post-modern threat to the past / Kevin Walsh
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Archaeology has had an uneasy relationship with the theories of structuralism. Michael Foucault used archaeology as a metaphor, opposing the "history of that language" to the "archaeology of that silence". For the most part, archaeologists have preferred to leave these theories of what lies behind their methods and perceptions on one side. Recently, however, they have begun to face up to the difficult task of making the connections between the past interpretation, and the present. The writers in this volume address the problems of archaeology. The connections are not easy to establish, as a great deal of theory seems of little relevance to the everyday practice of archaeology, and much of post-structuralism refers exclusively back to itself rather than to the more specific concerns of a historical discipline. But where the junction between post-structuralism and archaeology can be made, the results are innovative and enriching. The post-structuralist movement is heterogeneous, and the different papers reflect the varied contributions post-structuralist thought can offer to the understanding of the past and the processes of its interpretation.
Each stresses the need to be in application of ideas that have developed in other disciplines. But in the same way that new ideas have transformed the work of the archaeologists in the last 30 years, so too the conceptual interaction between archaeology and post-structuralism will have revolutionary consequences.
「Nielsen BookData」 より