Argumentation theory and the rhetoric of assent

書誌事項

Argumentation theory and the rhetoric of assent

edited by David Cratis Williams and Michael David Hazen

(Studies in rhetoric and communication)

University of Alabama Press, c1990

  • : alk. paper

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 7

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Consists of papers thoroughly revised and heavily edited by original authors as well as editors after having been presented at two Wake Forest University argumentation conferences, held at Wake Forest in Nov. 1982 and Nov. 1984

Includes bibliographical references (p. 196-219) and index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent is a collection of contemporary essays that addresses the general question of when, if ever, assent to a proposition is justified"", aiming to break new ground in the modern study of argumentation theory and practice. Following the lead of Wayne Booth in ""Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent"", the authors in this collection seek in argumentation theory an alternative to the dissensus bred by skepticsm and the consensus bred by faithful adherence to dogma. While they all address the central problematic of assent, they do so from a variety of perspectives, traversing much of the field of argumentation studies. In their considerations of the general question, many essays move inexorably toward considerations of power.

「Nielsen BookData」 より

関連文献: 1件中  1-1を表示

詳細情報

ページトップへ