Natural syntax : iconicity and erosion
著者
書誌事項
Natural syntax : iconicity and erosion
UT Back-in-Print Service, c1985
- タイトル別名
-
Cambridge studies in linguistics
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全4件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Reprint. Originally published: Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] ; New York : Cambridge University Press , 1985 (Cambridge studies in linguistics)
Title from original t.p
Bibliography: p. 262-277
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The view that language is in some way 'arbitrary', that there is no formal relationship between a linguistic message and the thought it is meant to convey, is long established and pervasive. The goal of John Haiman's study is to challenge the monopoly of arbitrariness, which he believes has affected in significant ways many models of linguistic description and analysis, notably those proposed by Saussure and more recently by Chomsky and his associates. Linguistic structures, Dr Hainian claims, may be compared to (non-linguistic) diagrams of our thoughts, and deviate from iconicity in many of the same ways and for much the same reasons as do diagrams in general. Arbitrariness develops as a result of the relatively familiar principles of economy, generalization and association. In relation to this thesis, Dr Haiman considers a wide variety of constructions, including conditionals and interrogatives, gapping, causative structures, auxiliaries and reflexives, and provides a wealth of exemplification from different languages that also points to typological differences in respect of iconicity.
目次
- Part I. Iconicity in Language: 1. Isomorphism
- 2. Motivation
- Part II. Economy and the Erosion of Iconicity: 3. Economic motivation
- 4. Iconicity vs. economy: the case of clause incorporation
- 5. The case of lexical elaboration
- 6. Limitations of the medium: competing motivations
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より