Law's quandary
著者
書誌事項
Law's quandary
Harvard University Press, 2007, c2004
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全2件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
この図書・雑誌をさがす
注記
"First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 2007"--T.p. verso
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This lively book reassesses a century of jurisprudential thought from a fresh perspective, and points to a malaise that currently afflicts not only legal theory but law in general. Steven Smith argues that our legal vocabulary and methods of reasoning presuppose classical ontological commitments that were explicitly articulated by thinkers from Aquinas to Coke to Blackstone, and even by Joseph Story. But these commitments are out of sync with the world view that prevails today in academic and professional thinking. So our law-talk thus degenerates into "just words"--or a kind of nonsense.
The diagnosis is similar to that offered by Holmes, the Legal Realists, and other critics over the past century, except that these critics assumed that the older ontological commitments were dead, or at least on their way to extinction; so their aim was to purge legal discourse of what they saw as an archaic and fading metaphysics. Smith's argument starts with essentially the same metaphysical predicament but moves in the opposite direction. Instead of avoiding or marginalizing the "ultimate questions," he argues that we need to face up to them and consider their implications for law.
目次
Preface Part I. Law and Metaphysics? 1. Just Words? 2. Ontological Dynasties Part II. (How) Is Law for Real? 3. Does "the Law" Exist? 4. the Jurisprudence of Modernity Part III. The Metaphysics of Legal Meaning 5. How Does Law Mean? 6. Author(s) Wanted Part IV. Mind the Gap 7. Law in a Quandary Epilogue: Confusion and Confession Notes Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より