Paleointensity of the Earth's Magnetic Field for the Past 400 Ma: Evidence for a Dipole Structure during the Mesozoic Low.

  • Perrin M.
    Laboratoire de Géophysique et Tectonique, UMR CNRS 5573, Université Montpellier II
  • Shcherbakov V.
    Geophysical Observatory

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • Paleointensity of the Earth′s Magnetic Field for the Past 400Ma:Evidence for a Dipole Structure during the Mesozoic Low
  • Paleointensity of the Earth s Magnetic

Search this article

Abstract

Despite the limited number of paleointensity data available for the last 400 Ma, some general features of the magnetic field in the past can be drawn from their analysis. A mild selection applied to the set drastically reduced the number of determinations, underscoring the unequal quality of the paleointensity estimates at hand and the clear need for many more new reliable studies. However, with or without selection, the record is characterized by a succession of periods with alternatively low and high fields, but data available are yet insufficient to propose any model of transition between both regimes. For the last 400 Ma, the dipole nature of the main field is preserved. This is also true when only data from the Mesozoic Dipole Low (120-260 Ma) are considered. Moreover it is shown that the Mesozoic data are very unlikely to represent an insufficient sampling of a Neogene-type field. These last observations strengthen the reality of this long period where the intensity of the main field was roughly only one third of the present-day value. A possible relation between field strength and secular variation (approximated by standard deviation) appears to exist, although this remark is compromised by the existence of a similar relation between standard deviation and number of determinations. The distribution of all Virtual Dipole Moments is log-normal, as shown before, but when only the selected data set is considered the distribution is clearly bi-modal. An oscillatory or bimodal paleointensity behaviour rather than a monotone variation is not at all unexpected given the highly non-linear geodynamo equations.

Journal

Citations (6)*help

See more

References(11)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top