A Study on Tissues around Dental Implant Superstructures
-
- Ohto Takaichi
- Meikai University School of Dentistry, Post-Doctoral Institute of Clinical Dentistry Saitama
-
- Motomura Youichi
- Meikai University School of Dentistry, Post-Doctoral Institute of Clinical Dentistry Saitama
-
- Mounai Nobutake
- Meikai University School of Dentistry, Post-Doctoral Institute of Clinical Dentistry Saitama
-
- Matsuda Satoru
- Meikai University School of Dentistry, Post-Doctoral Institute of Clinical Dentistry Saitama
-
- Araki Hisao
- Meikai University School of Dentistry, Post-Doctoral Institute of Clinical Dentistry Saitama
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- インプラント上部構造が周囲組織に及ぼす影響
- ―インプラント周囲炎と上部構造の固定方法との関係―
- -The Association between Peri-implantitis and Superstructure Fixation Methods-
Search this article
Abstract
In determining long-term prognosis of dental implant treatments, control of inflammation in peri-implant tissue is an important factor. The level of inflammation in peri-implant tissues was investigated by evaluating 1)plaque accumulation,2)volume of implant crevicular fluid, and 3)marginal bone resorption around implants. Screw-retained superstructures and cemented superstructures were compared in terms of inflammatory conditions in surrounding tissues. As for statistical analysis,Mann-Whitney U-test was used for inter-group comparison. A possible correlation was evaluated by regression analysis.<br/> The results are as follows:<br/> 1. The measurement of implant crevicular fluid volume was larger in the screw-retained prosthesis group,18 to 85(mean 42.6±6.3), than in the cemented prosthesis group,4 to 26(mean 16.3±2.3)with statistical significance(p<0.001).<br/> 2.With screw-retained prostheses, a correlation was confirmed between disclosing staining of outer crowns and volume of implant crevicular fluid(r=0.883).<br/> 3. Three years after the delivery of superstructures, marginal bone resorption around implants was 0 to 0.80mm(0.40±0.70mm on the mesial sides,0.39±0.08mm on the distal sides, mean 0.40±0.74mm)for screw-retained prostheses and 0 to 0.80mm(0.31±0.77mm on the mesial sides,0.35±0.06mm on the distal sides, mean 0.33±0.07mm)for cemented prostheses, indicating no statistical difference between the two groups.<br/> 4. A correlation was not found between marginal bone resorption around implants and disclosing staining of outer crowns as well as volume of implant crevicular fluid.<br/> Peri-implant inflammation was more significant around screw-retained superstructures, which suggests that it is largely affected by plaque accumulated in slight gaps between inner crowns and outer crowns.<br/>
Journal
-
- Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
-
Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology 15 (1), 17-23, 2002
Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205510314240
-
- NII Article ID
- 10008137254
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10072606
-
- ISSN
- 21879117
- 09146695
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed