犬のミミヒゼンダニ寄生に対する10%フィプロニルの治療効果  [in Japanese] Efficacy of 10% Fipronil against Infestation of Dogs by Otodectes cynotis  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

ミミヒゼンダニ寄生犬に対する10%フィプロニルの効果を検討した. 31頭のミミヒゼンダニ寄生犬に対して耳道内をクリーニングした後, 3滴 (約150μ<I>l</I>) の10%フィプロニルを耳内に投与した. 約1カ月後にミミヒゼンダニの存在を臨床症状の変化とともに検査した. フィプロニルの処置により, 31例中29例 (93.5%) でミミヒゼンダニが消失した.耳内の掻痒や耳垢の量を指標とした臨床症状もそれぞれ28例 (90.3%) で改善が認められた.わずか3例 (9.7%) において, フィプロニル投与後に一時的に頭を振る動作が認められた以外は, 全身的な副作用はいずれの例にも認められなかった. 結論として, 10%フィプロニルはその有効性および安全性, そして応用の容易さから, 犬のミミヒゼンダニ寄生症例の治療に推奨される.

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of 10% fipronil against infestations of dogs by <I>Otodectes cynotis</I>. After ear-canal cleaning, 3 drops (about 150μ<I>l</I>) of 10% fipronil were instilled into the ears of 31 dogs naturally infested with <I>O. cynotis</I>. About 1 month later, the animals were re-examined for evidence of mites in ears that had manifested clinical signs. Treatment with fipronil had eliminated <I>O. cynotis</I> in 29 out of 31 (93.5%) dogs. Clinical signs of otic pruritus and exudate too improved in 28 (90.3%) cases. Except for 3 cases (9.7%) of temporary head shaking when fipronil was administered, no general adverse e th fipronil had eliminated <I>O. cynotis</I> in 29 out of 31 (93.5%) dogs. Clinical signs of otic pruritus and exudate too improved in 28 (90.3%) cases. Except for 3 cases (9.%) of temporary head shaking when fipronil was administered, no general adverse effects were noted. Therefore, because of its efficacy, safety, and simplicity of application, 10% fipronil is recommended for treatment of <I>O. cynotis</I> infestation in dogs.

Journal

  • Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association

    Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association 54(4), 279-281, 2001-04-20

    Japan Veterinary Medical Association

References:  14

  • <no title>

    ATWELL RB.

    Aust Vet Pract 26, 155-157, 1996

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BAKER E.

    J Am Vet Med Assoc 164, 1125-1126, 1974

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    CURTIS CF.

    Vet Rec 139, 43-44, 1996

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    KWOCHKA KW.

    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 17, 1263-1284, 1987

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    LARKIN AD.

    Ann Allergy 46, 301-303, 1981

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    LOVELL RA.

    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 20, 453-468, 1990

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    NUTTALL TJ.

    J Small Anim Pract 39, 237-239, 1998

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    POSTAL JR.

    Vet Dermatol 6, 153-157, 1995

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    ROSYCHUK RAW.

    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 24, 21-952, 1994

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    ROTH L.

    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 18, 755-764, 1988

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    YAZWINSKI TA.

    Vet Med Small Anim Clin 76, 1749-1751, 1981

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    COCHET P.

    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinetics 2, 211-216, 1997

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    COLE L. M.

    Pesticide Biochem Physiol 46, 47-54, 1993

    Cited by (2)

  • <no title>

    MOFFAT A. S.

    Science 261, 550-551, 1993

    DOI  Cited by (2)

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    10008760651
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN00191857
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • Article Type
    ART
  • ISSN
    04466454
  • NDL Article ID
    5754814
  • NDL Source Classification
    ZR22(科学技術--農林水産--畜産)
  • NDL Call No.
    Z18-352
  • Data Source
    CJP  NDL  J-STAGE  JASI 
Page Top