TRIALS OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY BY TRANSNASAL ENDOSCOPY USING A SMALL-CALIBER ENDOSCOPE

DOI 5 Citations 11 References
  • AYADA Minoru
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine Department of Gastroenterology, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital
  • NAKANO Tatsunori
    Department of Gastroenterology, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital
  • HOTTA Naoki
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine
  • NAKAE Harumichi
    Department of Gastroenterology, Chubu Rosai Hospital
  • KUNII Shin
    Department of Gastroenterology, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives
  • YOSHIDA Kagumi
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine Department of Gastroenterology, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital
  • OKUMURA Akihiko
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine
  • ISHIKAWA Tetsuya
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine
  • FUKUZAWA Yoshitaka
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine
  • KAKUMU Shinichi
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology , Aichi Medical University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 経鼻的細径内視鏡を用いた経皮内視鏡的胃瘻造設術の試み

Search this article

Abstract

We performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) by transnasal endoscopy using a small-caliber endoscope for the purpose of relieving the pain and stress of gastrointestinal endoscopy and PEG without conscious cedation. The usefulness and safety were compared between cases performed PEG by transnasal endoscopy and those by transoral endoscopy. Cases with dysphagia by neurological diseases were divided into two groups randomly. The pull technique was used for both groups. We observed vital signs etc to compare pain and stress in transnasal insertion group and transoral insertion group. An increase in blood pressure and pulse rate was significantly small during PEG in the transnasal insertion group compared to the transoral group. There was no major complication in the transnasal insertion group as well as the transoral group. Our experience suggested that PEG by transnasal endoscopy using a smallcaliber endoscope is more useful than PEG by transoral endoscopy to relieve the pain and stress, and PEG by transnasal endoscopy is a safe method as well as PEG by transoral endoscopy.

Journal

Citations (5)*help

See more

References(11)*help

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top