合理的受容可能性と真理  [in Japanese] Rational Acceptability and Truth  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

    • 横山 幹子 YOKOYAMA Mikiko
    • 筑波大学図書館情報メディア研究科 Graduate School of Library, Information and Media Studies, University of Tsukuba

Abstract

In “From Alethic Anti-realism to Alethic Realism” Künne distinguishes between alethic realism and alethic anti-realism. This article examines whether or not alethic anti-realism is appropriate, when we take the position of using common sense to settle a philosophical problem. To that end, I will first review Künne's theory. Next, I will point out that Putnam's natural realists are alethic realists, that Wright's moderate internalists are alethic ani-realists, and that Wright argues against Putnam. Then, I will argue that Künne's conception of truth escapes the criticism of Wright's argument. Lastly I will also review Tennant's argument for anti-realism, and argue that in spite of Tennant's argument, alethic anti-realism is not appropriate when considered from a commonsense point of view.

Journal

  • Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science

    Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 35(1), 1-9, 2007-12-25

    Japan Association for Philosophy of Science

References:  13

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    10020018114
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN00036945
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • Article Type
    ART
  • ISSN
    02227668
  • NDL Article ID
    9465878
  • NDL Source Classification
    ZM4(科学技術--科学技術一般--自然科学)
  • NDL Call No.
    Z14-80
  • Data Source
    CJP  NDL  J-STAGE 
Page Top