Olfactory Evaluation Using a Self-Administered Odor Questionnaire

  • Tsuzuki Kenzo
    Department of Otolaryngology, Hyogo College of Medicine
  • Fukazawa Keijiro
    Fukazawa Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic
  • Takebayashi Hironori
    Department of Otolaryngology, Hyogo College of Medicine
  • Oka Hideki
    Department of Otolaryngology, Hyogo College of Medicine
  • Miwa Takaki
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University
  • Kurono Yuichi
    Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
  • Nibu Kenichi
    Department of Otolaryngology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Matsune Shoji
    Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
  • Uchida Jun
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Kobayashi Masayoshi
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Ohta Yasushi
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University
  • Shiga Hideaki
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University
  • Kobayakawa Tatsu
    National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering
  • Sakagami Masafumi
    Department of Otolaryngology, Hyogo College of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 簡易な嗅覚評価のための「日常のにおいアンケート」
  • Olfactory evaluation using a self-administrated odor questionnaire

Search this article

Abstract

We evaluated a 20-item self-administered odor questionnaire for assessing olfactory function, proposed in 2003 by the Japan Rhinologic Society committee on olfaction tests. The 20-items selected based on results of olfactory studies in Japan were steamed rice, miso, seaweed, soy sauce, baked bread, butter, curry, garlic, orange, strawberry, green tea, coffee, chocolate, household gas, garbage, timber, stercus (shit), sweat, flower, and perfume. Subjects were 302 people —179 men and 123 women (average age: 35.7 years)— having no history of nasal or paranasal disease and tested between December 2004 and December 2007. Subjects were asked to score items as follows: “always smelled” (2 points); “sometimes smelled” (1 point); “never smelled” (0 points); or “unknown or no recent experience” (no score). Scores were calculated and represented using a percentage. Response was 99.3% (300/302), with two subjects excluded for reporting more than 10 “unexplainable” items. The mean score was 95.2% (n=300). Of the 302, 281 (93.0%) agreed on the number and 252 (83.4%) on the content of items. Scores correlated statistically significantly with those of a visual analogue scale (rs=0.501, p<0.0001, n=300). We concluded that the self-administered odor questionnaire is useful in assessing olfactory function in normal subjects. The next step will be to administer the questionnaire to diseased or otherwise compromised subjects to determine whether it is useful for clinically diagnosing such olfactory dysfunction.

Journal

Citations (4)*help

See more

References(13)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top