JITの視点からみた自動車部品の中・長距離物流におけるサード・パーティー・ロジスティクスの役割 Long-Distance Transportation of Automotive Parts by Third-Party Logistics Providers from the Viewpoint of Spatial Organization of Just-in-Time Systems

この論文にアクセスする

この論文をさがす

著者

抄録

日本における自動車部品の中・長距離のジャスト・イン・タイムによる物流システムは,特にオイルショック以降,多品種生産,フレキシブルな生産への移行,通信情報システムの発達,完成車工場立地の広域化を背景として,完成車メーカー,部品サプライヤー,その物流子会社やサード・パーティー・ロジスティクス(3PL)相互の協力により形成された.各部品サプライヤーからミルクラン方式で集荷する集散地の集荷物流センターと,完成車工場近くで,部品の仕分け・定時多回納入を行う配送納入センターを設け,その間は大型車で幹線集約輸送をする.それは,積合わせによる幹線輸送における規模の経済の実現と,きめ細かな仕分けや多頻度配送を可能とする範囲の経済を同時に実現するフレキシブルな物流システムである.各部品メーカーが物流コストを負担し,多様な物流が展開している本田技研熊本製作所と,完成車メーカー側が物流コストを負担して,3PLを元請にして集荷している三菱自動車水島製作所の具体的事例について比較,考察した.

Especially since the oil crises, Japan's long-distance, wide-area Just-in-Time logistics systems have been established through mutual cooperation between completed-car manufacturers, parts suppliers, their logistics subsidiaries, and third-party logistics providers (3PL), against a background of a shift to diverse, flexible production, development of communication and information systems, and more dispersed locations of completed-car factories.<br>Before the oil crises, during the medium- and long-distance transport of auto parts, longer transport times and distances tended to result in parts delivery delays, making it difficult to arrange space for storage and sorting. This in turn resulted in inefficient circulation of vehicles and staff and led to higher costs. In response to such problems, 3PL built logistics centers with vendor-consolidation and cross-dock functions, which made consolidation, trunk transport, sorting, and division into periodic, small-quantity, high-frequency deliveries possible. These initiatives boosted the circulation rates of vehicles and staff, which reduced transport time, parts delivery delays, transport costs, and storage space needed; clarified the flow of parts and information; and reduced wasteful processes and superfluous staff to achieve greater transport efficiency. In sum, these completed flexible logistics systems simultaneously achieved economy of scale in consolidated trunk transport and economy of scope with detailed sorting and frequent small-lot deliveries.<br>As examples, we compare the Kumamoto Plant of Honda Motors and the Mizushima Plant of Mitsubishi Motors. In Honda Motors' logistics, costs are mainly borne by each supplier, with reliance on the suppliers' own initiatives. However, Honda provides indirect guidance and support, for example, it transports parts as backhaul cargo after completed-product transport, using 3PL company A. Honda thus developed diverse logistics using railway containers and ferry boats. On the other hand, Mitsubishi Motors pays the all costs of parts logistics to 3PL, and its logistics are greatly influenced by the existing 3PL prime contractor (company E), which developed an information system linking miscellaneous suppliers and many completed-car manufacturers. 3PL company E collects and consolidates numerous parts from each supplier for transport to Mitsubishi Motors using this common information system.<br>We also compare 3PL companies A and E. Company A transports parts as backhaul cargo after completed-product transport. This 3PL focuses on logistics techniques. On the other hand, company E is a provider of a shared information system that links parts suppliers with many car assemblers. Thus company E has the marked characteristics of a 4PL.

収録刊行物

  • 地理学評論 = Geographical review of Japan

    地理学評論 = Geographical review of Japan 85(1), 1-21, 2012-01-01

    公益社団法人 日本地理学会

参考文献:  41件中 1-41件 を表示

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    10030364466
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AA11591990
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • 資料種別
    ART
  • ISSN
    18834388
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    023436483
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z8-571
  • データ提供元
    CJP書誌  NDL  J-STAGE 
ページトップへ