地域発展過程の合意形成の特性に着目した過疎地型地域経営モデルに関する事例的研究 : 石川県能登町「春蘭の里」の取り組みから A Case Study about Less Favoured Area Management Model focusing on the Characteristics of Consensus Building Style in the Process of Community Development : From a Approach of "Shunran no Sato" in Noto Town, Ishikawa Prefecture

この論文にアクセスする

この論文をさがす

著者

抄録

広域的に過疎化が進行する地域を事例として,地域再生の展開とその起点となった合意形成過程の展開に着目して,人口減少社会における地域経営の方法論に関する考察を試みる。研究対象として,地域づくり導入期に意識的に行政支援に依存しなかった地域が,明確な利益・経営規模の目標を掲げて農家民宿を計画して,合意形成の時間的制約を意識した結果,一部の構想賛同者のみで活動を起こした事例を取り上げる。具体的な研究課題として,対象地域が次第に地域の合意(協力)を拡大させると共に,行政による支援施策を呼び込みながら地域内の賛同者を拡大させ,活動を拡大させていった経緯を時系列的に読み解くことを目的とする。

During the depopulation era, the revitalization of rural mountainous areas that continue to shrink is a pressing problem. Under this severe circumstance, it is an essential task for design rural management policy to clarify the mechanisms of development of a vigorous region and construct the support systems for these regions, meaning constructing promotional systems for endogenous development. In this research, we conducted a field survey at Shunran no Sato, where local residents tried to revitalize the village by farm-inn and urban-rural exchange, and to evaluate the significance of consensus building in local development. In this area, the local development was founded upon an agreement by only seven persons under a time pressure to build a consensus. Through consensus building, this area could achieve revitalization even though on the verge of extinction by remarkable depopulation by means of obtaining official support and having the cooperation of local residents. In this paper, we review the merits, demerits, conditions, and important points underlying a prompt action of a rural activation project based on partial agreement for the local, endogenous development.<br>As a result, it was clear that, although partial consensus building prevented the residents and region from various potential losses, it did not prevent some conflicts, specifically those that occurred early in the program. However, the core organization was careful to avoid conflicts. Overall, the style of regional planning in this area was good in terms of avoiding a conflict in early stages and establishing an incentive design in its developing stages.<br>However, we must beware this report's findings, because making light of consensus building corresponds to an abuse of a precautionary principle. As such, to accomplish partial consensus building for the prompt action toward local revitalization, it is necessary to first base the scenarios on rational basis that indicate that the area cannot avoid failing if residents don't agree.

収録刊行物

  • 農村計画学会誌 = Journal of Rural Planning Association

    農村計画学会誌 = Journal of Rural Planning Association 30(3), 436-442, 2011-12-30

    農村計画学会

参考文献:  19件中 1-19件 を表示

被引用文献:  2件中 1-2件 を表示

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    10030475292
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AN00386889
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • 資料種別
    ART
  • ISSN
    09129731
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    023459257
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z18-1918
  • データ提供元
    CJP書誌  CJP引用  NDL  IR  J-STAGE 
ページトップへ