安静時における側腹筋厚測定の検者間信頼性と臨床的有効最小誤差

DOI Web Site Web Site 参考文献24件
  • 伊藤 秀幸
    （財）潤和リハビリテーション振興財団　延岡リハビリテーション病院 吉備国際大学大学院（通信制）　保健科学研究科理学療法学専攻
  • 諸井 典子
    （財）潤和リハビリテーション振興財団　潤和会記念病院
  • 日高 雅仁
    （財）潤和リハビリテーション振興財団　延岡リハビリテーション病院
  • 古瀬 正志
    （財）潤和リハビリテーション振興財団　延岡リハビリテーション病院

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Thickness in the Resting State Measured Using Ultrasound Scanning
  • アンセイジ ニ オケル ガワ フッキンコウ ソクテイ ノ ケンシャ カン シンライセイ ト リンショウテキ ユウコウ サイショウ ゴサ : チョウオンパ シンダン ソウチ オ シヨウ シテ
  • ─超音波診断装置を使用して─

この論文をさがす

抄録

[Purpose] The present study was conducted to determine the number of measurements required to establish the intra- and inter-class reliabilities of measurement of the thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles using ultrasound scanning equipment. [Subjects] Thes subjects were 15 healthy males. [Methods] To assess intraclass reliability, the measurement was conducted twice by the same examiner, and once, for interclass reliability, by three different examiners. The number of measurements required to establish a high level of reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard errors of measurement, and minimal clinically important difference. [Results] The interclass correlation coefficient was smaller than the intraclass correlation coefficient. Measurement errors of 0.57 to 0.77 mm were noted between the examiners, suggesting that changes of 1.59 mm for the external abdominal oblique muscle, 2.15 mm for the internal abdominal oblique muscle, and 1.77 mm for the transverse abdominal muscle or more should not be considered as measurement errors. The appropriate number of measurements was one: k=1.0. [Conclusion] The level of reliability was the highest when measurement of the thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles was performed once by the same examiner.<br>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (24)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ