Reducing Net CO_2 Emissions Using Charcoal as a Blast Furnace Tuyere Injectant

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

The replacement of coal-based fuels by renewable fuels such as charcoal is an attractive way to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from the integrated steelmaking route. Our previous studies have indicated that the potential for savings in net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions ranges from 32 to 58 percent, with use as a BF tuyere injectant being the largest application. The current study considered the combustibility of four types of charcoal in comparison with PCI coal under simulated BF raceway conditions. The major findings were that burnouts under standard conditions (air-cooled coaxial lance, O/C = 2.0) were comparable or better than that of the high volatile matter PCI coal studied, and a comparison with the trend line for burnout with injectant volatile matter previously established for coals, indicated that the hardwood charcoals studied had burnouts 40% (abs) higher than those of equivalent coals, and the softwood charcoal studied was higher again. A study of the effects of oxygen enrichment indicated that small increases were effective, and particularly so for the least combustible charcoal. Overall, the burnout results indicated that higher-than-coal injection rates should be possible in industrial practice, and in combination with the previous heat and mass balance results, they indicated the potential for increased BF productivity. The brief study of the combustion of coal-charcoal mixtures indicated good combustibility and predictable burnouts. The microscopic examination of both the charcoal injectants and their combustion chars indicated that there was significant fragmentation of the charcoals during combustion, boosting their already high surface areas and combustibility.

Journal

  • ISIJ International

    ISIJ International 52(8), 1489-1496, 2012-08-15

    The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan

References:  21

  • <no title>

    BIRAT J.-P.

    5th European Coke and Ironmakipg Cong., 2005, 2005

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    TAKEDA K.

    EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    MIWA T.

    EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    NORGATE T.

    ISIJ Int. 49, 587, 2009

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    FALLOT A.

    Rev. Metall. 106, 410, 2009

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    MATHIESON J. G.

    EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    MATHIESON J. G.

    CHEMECA 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    ASSIS P. S.

    AISTech 1, 345, 2009

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    TEODORO DA COSTA R.

    Rev. Metall.-CIT 105, 203, 2006

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BABICH A.

    ISIJ Int. 50, 81, 2010

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    NOGAMI H.

    ISIJ Int. 44, 1646, 2004

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BELLEVRAT E.

    Rev. Metall. 106, 318, 2009

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BABICH A.

    5th ICSTI, 2009 766, 2009

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    NG K. W.

    EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    MATHIESON J. G.

    Fuel 84, 1229, 2005

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    YAMAGUCHI K.

    ISIJ Int. 32, 716, 1992

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    ARIYAMA T.

    Advanced Pulverised Coal Injection Technology and Blast Furnace Operation 49, 2000

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BABICH A.

    EECR-METEC InSteelCon 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    BAILEY J. G.

    Fuel 69, 225, 1990

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    ROGERS H.

    CHEMECA 2011, 2011

    Cited by (1)

  • <no title>

    MACHADO J. G. M. S.

    Steel Res. Int. 81, 9, 2010

    Cited by (1)

Codes

Page Top