合衆国憲法修正一条の表現の自由とヘイトスピーチ Hate Speech and the First Amendment

この論文にアクセスする

この論文をさがす

抄録

When racial/sexual harassment became rampant in the U.S. in 1980s, many colleges and universities along with local governments adopted regulations which proscribed hate speech and other fotms of hatred. In 1992, however, the Supreme Court struck down an ordinance banning "fighting words" that insulted or provoked violence "on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender." In R.A.V.v.City of St. Paul, the Court stated that the ordinance impermissibly discriminated against unpopular topics. Critics of R.A.V. showed deep concern for the logic of the Court and others provided their reasoning for upholding strictly framed regulations. In this Article, I intend to present outline of the debate on hate speech regulations in the United States. In Chapter II, I overview the anti-regulation argument by presenting R.A.V. and then point out the flaw in its logic. In Chapter III, I turn to the pro-regulation argument and discuss how the proponents of the regulations solves the problem of content/viewpoint discrimination. I then present the harm caused by hate speech, and finally analyze hate speech regulations under the values of the Freedom of Speech.

収録刊行物

  • 法政論叢

    法政論叢 36(1), 160-169, 1999

    日本法政学会

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    110002803535
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AN00197809
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • ISSN
    0386-5266
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    4938108
  • NDL 雑誌分類
    ZA11(政治・法律・行政--法律・法律学) // ZA2(政治・法律・行政--政治学)
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z2-616
  • データ提供元
    NDL  NII-ELS  J-STAGE 
ページトップへ