構造方程式モデリングは, 因子分析, 分散分析, バス解析のすべてにとって代わるのか? Does Structural Equation Modeling Outperform Traditional Factor Analysis. Analysis of Variance and Path Analysis?

この論文をさがす

著者

抄録

It is well-known that structural equation modeling (SEM) can represent a variety of traditional multivariate statistical models. This fact does not necessarily mean that SEM should be used for the traditional models. It is often said that a general model is more difficult to handle than a specific model developed for a given situation. In this paper, we shall clarify relative advantages between SEM and several traditional statistical models. Rather than comparison in mathematical properties, we shall discuss how and when SEM outperforms corresponding traditional models in practical situations. Special attention is paid to statistical analysis of a scale score, the sum of indicator variables determined by factor analysis. In particular, we shall study relative advantages between (i) confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis, (ii) multiple indicator analysis and correlational and regression analysis of scale scores, (iii) analysis of factor means and analysis of variance of scale scores, and (iv) path analysis and multiple regression analysis.

収録刊行物

  • 行動計量学

    行動計量学 29(2), 138-159, 2002-12-25

    日本行動計量学会

参考文献:  32件中 1-32件 を表示

被引用文献:  20件中 1-20件 を表示

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    110003812515
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AN0008437X
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • 資料種別
    REV
  • ISSN
    03855481
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    6613024
  • NDL 雑誌分類
    ZE1(社会・労働--社会科学・社会思想・社会学) // ZD43(経済--統計)
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z6-1106
  • データ提供元
    CJP書誌  CJP引用  NDL  NII-ELS 
ページトップへ