SURVEY OF FACTORS UNDERLYING TREATMENT CHOICE FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER (radical prostatectomy vs extrabeam radiotherapy)

• Teramoto Sakiko

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Ota Tomonori

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Itaya Naoshi

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Maniwa Akimitsu

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Matsui Takashi

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Nishimura Yoji

  Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center

• Shoji Kazufusa

  Department of Radiology, Kameda Medical Center

Bibliographic Information

Other Title

• 当院における限局性前立腺癌の治療選択 (前立腺全摘術対放射線治療) に関する患者の意識度調査
• 当院〔亀田メディカルセンター〕における限局性前立腺癌の治療選択(前立腺全摘術対放射線治療)に関する患者の意識度調査
• トウ イン カメダ メディカルセンター ニ オケル ゲンキョクセイ ゼンリツセンガン ノ チリョウ センタク ゼンリツセン ゼンテキジュツ タイ ホウシャセン チリョウ ニ カンスル カンジャ ノ イシキド チョウサ

Abstract

(Purpose) Little is known regarding factors for decision-making on treatment by localized prostate cancer patients. We therefore conducted a survey series of cases for influence on treatment decision making, and also satisfaction after therapy.<br>(Materials and methods) A total of 51 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were mailed original questionnaires about their treatment decision-making factors and satisfaction and the results compared between the two groups.<br>(Result) Some 48 (94.1%) patients responded to the questionnaire, 38 (79.2%) and 10 (20.8%) after RP and EBRT, respectively. The major factor determining the decision as to treatment approach was the physician in both groups (more than 90%). Excluding physicians, family or others were more important in the RP group than the EBRT group (p=0.023). RP group patients desired removal of their prostate for cancer control, while, EBRT group patients favored the less invasive approach in consideration of side effects. Over 80% patients indicated they would definitely or probably choose the same treatment again, although some of the RP group would switch to watchfulwaiting because of sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence and the invasive nature of the procedure.<br>(Conclusion) Physicians are in a most important position to help patients understand prostate cancer and treatment, outcomes, and need to help them make their best choice, with appropriate follow up including mental care.

Journal

• The Japanese Journal of Urology

  The Japanese Journal of Urology 97 (7), 823-829, 2006

  THE JAPANESE UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Keywords

• Treatment choice for patients with localized prostate cancer
• radical prostatectomy
• extrabeam radiotherapy

Details

• CRID: 1390282680035538560
• NII Article ID: 110004851482
• NII Book ID: AN00196577
• DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.823
• ISSN: 18847110
• ISSN: 00215287
• NDL BIB ID: 8585409
• Web Site: https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I8585409
• Web Site: https://search.jamas.or.jp/link/ui/2007095277
• Data Source:
  • JaLC
  • NDL
  • Crossref
  • CiNii Articles
• Abstract License Flag: Disallowed