「合意する主体」による正義の幻想 : 契約論的平等から反証的正義へ The Myth of Justice as Consensus

この論文にアクセスする

この論文をさがす

著者

抄録

What determines the content of justice? The consensus among subjects, justified by social contact, is one answer to this question. Current liberalism maintains that consensus is constructed by social contract - but does the principle of consensus among subjects really lead to the theory of justice? It is important to notice that the current theory of consensus implies that those who cannot satisfactorily participate in consensus are no longer subjects. This article insists that justice should not be based on consensus, but understood as a process of falsification, implying that justice should also remain provi sional.

What determines the content of justice? The consensus among subjects, justified by social contact, is one answer to this question. Current liberalism maintains that consensus is constructed by social contract - but does the principle of consensus among subjects really lead to the theory of justice? It is important to notice that the current theory of consensus implies that those who cannot satisfactorily participate in consensus are no longer subjects. This article insists that justice should not be based on consensus, but understood as a process of falsification, implying that justice should also remain provi sional.

収録刊行物

  • 人間社会学研究集録

    人間社会学研究集録 1, 3-19, 2006-03-31

    大阪府立大学大学院人間社会学研究科

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    110004870378
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AA1213117X
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • 資料種別
    Departmental Bulletin Paper
  • ISSN
    1880-683X
  • データ提供元
    NII-ELS  IR 
ページトップへ