「国語」と「古文」の境界線をめぐる対立 : 『尋常中学校教科細目調査報告』(1898(明治31)年)における上田万年と小中村義象

• 八木 雄一郎

  筑波大学大学院

書誌事項

タイトル別名

• The cause of opposition between Kazutoshi Ueda and Yoshikata Konakamura

抄録

The Literary History installed into Japanese in 1902 has an important significance when one studies the formation process of the concept of Japanese classics in the history of Japanese language teaching. Therefore, this report focuses on the survey of 1898, which is the original form. And from the background of opposition in the investigation committees engaged in making of this survey, the point at issue in the establishment process of the Literary History concept is clarified. The opposition was between Kazutoshi Ueda and Yoshikata Konakamura. The cause of the opposition was that Ueda presented Japanese language teaching theory with an emphasis on modern language based on linguistics, whereas Konakamura presented Japanese language teaching theory with an emphasis on classical language based on National learning. As a conclusion, Ueda's theory was accepted. The writings after the Kinko Era (12c-16c) were handled in Reading, and the writings before Chuko era (8c-12c) were handled only in Literary History.

収録刊行物

• 国語科教育

  国語科教育 61 (0), 27-34, 2007

  全国大学国語教育学会

詳細情報

• CRID: 1390282680801727232
• NII論文ID: 110006274054
• DOI: 10.20555/kokugoka.61.0_27
• ISSN: 21899533
• ISSN: 02870479
• 本文言語コード: ja
• データソース種別:
  • JaLC
  • CiNii Articles
• 抄録ライセンスフラグ: 使用不可