Relation Between Beliefs Measured in the Control, Agency, and Means-Ends Interview (CAMI) and Learning Behavior :

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • CAMI(Control, Agency, and Means-Ends Interview)による期待信念と学習行動の関連
  • CAMI(Control, Agency, and Means-Ends Interview)による期待信念と学習行動の関連--努力と方略の信念の弁別
  • CAMI Control Agency and Means Ends Interview ニ ヨル キタイ シンネン ト ガクシュウ コウドウ ノ カンレン ドリョク ト ホウリャク ノ シンネン ノ ベンベツ
  • —努力と方略の信念の弁別—
  • Beliefs in Effort and Strategy

Search this article

Abstract

  In the present study, the Control, Agency, and Means-Ends Interview (CAMI ; Skinner, Chapman, & Baltes, 1988a, 1988b), which consists of 3 beliefs: Control, Agency, and Means-Ends beliefs, was expanded by the addition of “strategy” for new beliefs, and the relations between the Interview results and learning behaviors (self-regulated learning strategies, persistence in learning, and course choice) were investigated.  The factor analysis structure revealed a distinction between “effort” and “strategy”.  Structural equation modeling indicated that Agency beliefs for effort influenced cognitive strategies and course choice, whereas Agency beliefs for strategy influenced meta-cognitive strategies and persistence in learning.  Furthermore, Means-Ends beliefs for effort influenced cognitive strategies and persistence in learning.  However, Means-Ends beliefs for strategy did not influence learning behaviors.  The distinction between beliefs in “effort” and “strategy” was also observed based on the relations between the Interview results and learning behaviors.  The present results suggest the importance of adding beliefs in “strategy” to the Control, Agency, and Means-Ends Interview.

Journal

Citations (2)*help

See more

References(14)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top