分裂文の総記的含意  [in Japanese] Exhaustiveness implicatures of cleft constructions  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

本稿は, 英語分裂文の総記的含意を巡る議論を概観し, (i)否定分裂文における総記的含意, (ii)分裂文の焦点に生じる焦点下接詞, 及び付加下接詞と総記的含意の却下可能性について, 実際の談話から収集した分裂文を詳細に分析し, 英語分裂文の総記的含意は, 会話の含意であることを明示的に論証するものである。

This article deals with the exhaustiveness implicatures of cleft constructions in discourse. The main points argued here are (i) that Halvorsen's (1978) claim that the exhaustiveness implicatures of clefts should be conventional implicatures cannot be tenable; (ii) that the exhaustiveness implicatures can be cancelable in some of negative cleft sentences and clefts with focusing subjuncts only, just ; and (iii) that the exhaustiveness implicatures appears to beconversational implicatures rather than conventional ones.

Journal

  • Bulletin of Joetsu University of Education

    Bulletin of Joetsu University of Education 29, 199-205, 2010

    Joetsu University of Education

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    110008699574
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN10284863
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • Article Type
    departmental bulletin paper
  • Journal Type
    大学紀要
  • ISSN
    09158162
  • NDL Article ID
    10599926
  • NDL Source Classification
    ZV1(一般学術誌--一般学術誌・大学紀要)
  • NDL Call No.
    Z22-1197
  • Data Source
    NDL  NII-ELS  IR 
Page Top