死の害の形而上学  [in Japanese] Metaphysics of the Harm of Death  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

This paper aims to show that the combination of Three-dimensionalism, a theory of persistence, and Eternalism, a theory about the ontological nature of time, gives us the best solution to a widely known problem of the harm of death. To begin with, we argue that the following two claims are plausible: Termination Thesis, which says that people go out of existence when they die, and Harm after Death Thesis, which says that death harms people at some time after their death. Next we point out that there is an apparent conflict between these claims, as Epicurus and other philosophers argued. Then we show that the combination of Three-dimensionalism and Eternalism enables us to settle the conflict. Finally we show that the combination is preferable to two alternatives which have been discussed in the literature, namely, the combination of Four-dimensionalism and Eternalism (H. Silverstein), and the combination of Three-dimensionalism, Presentism and Meinongianism (P. Yourgrau).

Journal

  • Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science

    Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 39(1), 13-24, 2011

    Japan Association for Philosophy of Science

References:  19

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    110008798959
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN00036945
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • Article Type
    ART
  • ISSN
    0022-7668
  • NDL Article ID
    025903798
  • NDL Call No.
    Z14-80
  • Data Source
    CJP  NDL  NII-ELS  J-STAGE 
Page Top