High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS- guided fine- needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

• Kudo, Taiki

• Kawakami, Hiroshi

• Hayashi, Tsuyoshi

• Yasuda, Ichiro

• Mukai, Tsuyoshi

• Inoue, Hiroyuki

• Katanuma, Akio

• Kawakubo, Kazumichi

• Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi

• Doi, Shinpei

• Yamada, Reiko

• Maguchi, Hiroyuki

• Isayama, Hiroyuki

• Mitsuhashi, Tomoko

• Sakamoto, Naoya

Abstract

Background: EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) has a high diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic diseases. However, although most reports have typically focused on cytology, histological tissue quality has rarely been investigated. The effectiveness of EUS-FNA combined with high negative pressure (HNP) suction was recently indicated for tissue acquisition, but has not thus far been tested in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Objective: To evaluate the adequacy of EUS-FNA with HNP for the histological diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by using 25-gauge needles. Design: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled crossover trial. Setting: Seven tertiary referral centers. Patients: Patients referred for EUS-FNA of pancreatic solid lesions. From July 2011 to April 2012, 90 patients underwent EUS-FNA of pancreatic solid masses by using normal negative pressure (NNP) and HNP with 2 respective passes. The order of the passes was randomized, and the sample adequacy, quality, and histology were evaluated by a single expert pathologist. Intervention: EUS-FNA by using NNP and HNP. Main Outcome Measurements: The adequacy of tissue acquisition and the accuracy of histological diagnoses made by using the EUS-FNA technique with HNP. Results: We found that 72.2% (65/90) and 90% (81/90) of the specimens obtained using NNP and HNP, respectively, were adequate for histological diagnosis (P = .0003, McNemar test). For 73.3% (66/90) and 82.2% (74/90) of the specimens obtained by using NNP and HNP, respectively, an accurate diagnosis was achieved (P = .06, McNemar test). Pancreatitis developed in 1 patient after this procedure, which subsided with conservative therapy. Limitations: This was a single-blinded, crossover study. Conclusion: Biopsy procedures that combine the EUS-FNA with HNP techniques are superior to EUS-FNA with NNP procedures for tissue acquisition.

Journal

• Gastrointestinal endoscopy

  Gastrointestinal endoscopy 80 (6), 1030-1037, 2014-12

  Elsevier

Details

• CRID: 1050564288971396352
• NII Article ID: 120005539217
• HANDLE: 2115/57915
• ISSN: 00165107
• Text Lang: en
• Article Type: journal article
• Data Source:
  • IRDB
  • CiNii Articles