〈芸術性〉をいかに裁くか : 三島由紀夫「宴のあと」、高橋治「名もなき道を」、柳美里「石に泳ぐ魚」 (加藤國安教授 退職記念)  [in Japanese] How Do We Judge Artistic Quality? : On MISHIMA Yukio's "After the Banquet," TAKAHASHI Osamu's "Namonaki Michi wo (Down a Nameless Road)" and YU Miri's "Ishi ni Oyogu Sakana (A Fish Swimming in Stone)"  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Abstract

In this paper I discuss how literary studies could contribute to a legal argument concerning the artistic quality of literary works. To this end, I will revisit points of discussions in a series of legal trials regarding invasions of privacy found in literary texts, namely MISHIMA Yukio's "After the Banquet," TAKAHASHI Osamu's "Namonaki Michi wo (Down a Nameless Road)", and YÛ Miri's "Ishi ni Oyogu Sakana (A Fish Swimming in Stone)." The problems surrounding artistic quality - how to judge it, and whether or not to take it into account at all - have continued to trouble lawyers since it first became a crucial point in the judgment of "After the Banquet" in 1960. I suggest that 'artistic quality' refers to the possibilities of art. In particular, I argue that it can function to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding humanness in the public sphere.

Journal

  • 名古屋大学文学部研究論集

    名古屋大学文学部研究論集 (文学61), 181-202, 2015

    名古屋大学文学部

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    120005593362
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • Article Type
    departmental bulletin paper
  • Journal Type
    大学紀要
  • ISSN
    0469-4716
  • NDL Article ID
    026319203
  • NDL Call No.
    Z22-236
  • Data Source
    NDL  IR 
Page Top