小部の成立を再考する : 説一切有部との比較研究 Rethinking the Composition of the Khuddakanikaya : A Comparative Study with Sarvastivada Parallels

この論文にアクセスする

この論文をさがす

抄録

The ar ticle discusses how the Khuddakanikāya became a par t of the Pāli Tipiṭaka. In my book, Jōzabu Bukkyō no shisō keisei (Formation of Theravāda Buddhist Thought), I note that the Khuddakanikāya does not appear as a collection of suttantas in the four parts of the Pāli commentaries (Aṭṭhakathā) which refer to structure of the Pāli Tipiṭaka. Based on this assessment, I concluded that the Khuddakanikāya was the last collection added to the Pāli Tipiṭaka. In an article published in 2016, the scholar Toshifumi Shimizu critiqued my conclusion, insisting that the four parts of Pāli commentaries, which my book dealt with, do, in fact, mention the Khuddakanikāya. Reassessing these Pāli commentaries, I argue that Shimizu's hypothesis is not valid because it is based on cer tain misunderstandings of Pāli words, and their context, and, on account of more general flaws in the logic informing his critique.

収録刊行物

  • 東洋文化研究所紀要

    東洋文化研究所紀要 171, 348-304, 2017-03

    東京大学東洋文化研究所

各種コード

  • NII論文ID(NAID)
    120006027335
  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    AN00170926
  • 本文言語コード
    JPN
  • 資料種別
    departmental bulletin paper
  • 雑誌種別
    大学紀要
  • ISSN
    0563-8089
  • NDL 記事登録ID
    028098037
  • NDL 請求記号
    Z22-406
  • データ提供元
    NDL  IR 
ページトップへ