Concurrences and Differences between Faculty Staff and Standardized Patients in the Assessment of Medical Students in the Post-Clinical Clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination

IR

Search this article

Abstract

Background : Variations in assessments of medical students by faculty staff and standardized patients (SPs) have not been clarified by previous studies. We examined the concurrences and differences between and among these evaluators for medical students sitting the Post-Clinical Clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination (Post-CC OSCE). / Methods : The participants were 94 sixth-year Osaka City University Medical School students who were taking the Post-CC OSCE. They were each examined by three faculty staff and one or two SPs using a global assessment and six classified assessments. We analysed the average global/classified assessment scores for all 94 students, the average classified assessment scores for the students for whom differences exceeding 2 points between the average global assessment scores by the faculty staff and those by the SPs were not found, and those for the students for whom such differences were found using the Mann-Whitney U test....

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top