荊楚歳時記の書誌学的研究（下）

機関リポジトリ

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • A Bibliographical Study of Ching-Ch'u Sui-Shih-Chi (concluded)

この論文をさがす

抄録

(6) Tsung Lin’s original seems to have been lost between Sung and Yüan. It is generally held that the commentary by Tu Kung-shan was also lost during the Southern Sung dynasty. Especially Mr. Wada supports this view, his argument being based upon the Introduction to Sui-shih-kuang-chi (歳時廣記) by Chu Chien (朱鑑). The writer does not approve of his view. According to him Mr. Wada’s interpretation of the introduction is to be doubted.(7) It is certain that a fairly good text existed before 1370. The writer calls it as the text β. The texts which are reproduced in Shuo-fu (説郛) by T’ao Tsung-i and in Pao-yen-t’ang Pi-chi (寶顔堂秘笈) by Chen Chi-ju (陳繼儒) are derived from β.(8) Probably under the Ming dynasty the text β was combined with quotations quoted in other works of similar kind and the text α came into existence. The text in Shuo-fu by T’ao T’ing (陶珽) seems to be an excerpt from the α text(9) Therefore the current text is not a collection of quotations. The writer proves with eight evidences that the text in Pao-yen-t’ang is not a work consisting of quotations in other works.(10) It is possible to some degree to say that the older form of Ching-ch’u Sui-shih-chi is found in the text of Pao-yen-t’ang.(11) However, a great care should be taken in reading this edition, as in the course of transmission many passages have been dropped, corrupted or modified.

収録刊行物

  • 東洋学報

    東洋学報 36 (4), 493-532, 1954-03

    東洋文庫

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ