ランドスケープ概念の再検討のために — 人びとと環境とのかかかわりとランドスケープ —

DOI 機関リポジトリ HANDLE

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • For Reconsidering the Concept of Landscape

この論文をさがす

抄録

The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the concept of landscape in order to find a clue to clarify the relationships and standpoints of various perspectives on landscape that make the term extraordinary confusing and fascinating. Relatively recent discussions on landscape tend to stress movement, motion, becoming and bodily experiences, and refuse its visual aspect based on its etymology: ‘scape’ is not related to ‘scope’. This paper examines the discussions of Tim Ingold ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’ (1993), Paul Rodaway, Sensuous Geography (1994), and Kenneth R. Olwig ‘Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape’ (1996). All of them are published in 1990s, but influential or important in subsequent discussions and considerations on landscape. Rodaway’s definition of landscape stresses its visual aspect, Olwig’s etymological and historical study of landscape insists on its relations to community, custom, political and cultural identity, and Ingold deconstructs landscape focused on its temporality. This paper argues the visual aspect of landscape is worth to reconsider, and to discern various multiple paths and relationships between person and environment, definition of landscape focused on visual aspect is indispensable, and to identify environment as environment, detached, reflexive stance and experience are necessary. Landscape can be conceived as a way of detachment or experiences of detachment based on the visual.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ