Two Templates of Case Studies: Comparing Eisenhardt（1989） and Gioia, Corley and Hamilton（2012）

• 土屋, 佑介

• 辺見, 英貴

• TSUCHIYA, Yusuke

• HEMMI, Hidetaka

Bibliographic Information

Other Title

• ケース・スタディの２つのテンプレート　―Eisenhardt（1989） と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton（2012） の比較検討―
• ケース ・ スタディ ノ 2ツ ノ テンプレート : Eisenhardt (1989)ト Gioia, Corley and Hamilton (2012)ノ ヒカク ケントウ

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to clarify the Gioia Methodology（Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2012）, which has attracted attention as a qualitative method. Through a comparative analysis with the Eisenhardt（1989）template, we divided it into five items; epistemological foundations and research orientation, the need for prior research, data collection, logic of the analysis, and rhetoric of the writing. As a result, we proposed a taxonomy that organized the commonalities and differences between the two templates, and introduced a method to increase the rigor of case studies. Finally, we discussed three limitations in Gioia et al.（2012）.

Journal

• OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

  OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 21 (2・3), 1-14, 2020-06-30

  大阪産業大学学会

Keywords

• Case Studies
• Template
• Qualitative Method
• Comparative Analysis

Details

• CRID: 1051130853402941312
• NII Article ID: 40022348358
• NII Article ID: 120006892915
• NII Book ID: AA11394617
• ISSN: 13451456
• NDL BIB ID: 030639425
• Web Site: https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2280
• Web Site: https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000004-I030639425
• Text Lang: ja
• Article Type: departmental bulletin paper
• Data Source:
  • IRDB
  • NDL
  • CiNii Articles
  • KAKEN